Pol Casas Abella from Fourth Form reviews the annual TY House Speech competition:
On Sunday 2nd October, all
the college had the privilege of hearing 10 magnificent speeches from the
Transition Year forth formers. The
judges were Mr. McCarthy, Mr. Watts, and Henry Carroll, who was awarded third place in last year's event. Above all, I want to
say that (before commenting on their respective performances)
every single participant deserves respect. We all know that what they did was not an easy task. However, this
pressure didn’t seem to
the participants; almost every one of them had great enunciation, adopted an
effective variety of tone of voice and looked very confident on stage.
Caspar
Schulenberg opened up the night's entertainment with his speech based on
satire. He gave his opinion on what he enjoyed about this topic, highlighted
some examples to make us understand what he said, and emphasised the things
that he would change to make satire even better. I thought that the speech was
worthy of being placed as one of the top three, due to both the confidence that he
showed and the content that he offered. A lot of people would like to have his
public speaking gifts.
Then it was
Isabelle Townshend's moment to shine. Her speech was very interesting due to the fact that 9/11 is
a subject that I’m
passionate about. Moreover, she talked about it in a singular manner, defending
a conspiracy theory that most people are sceptical about. I think that she was
very bold in choosing to speak about her controversial topic, but at the same
time she had a lot of facts supporting it.
After Isabelle
came Ross Magill. I must mention the great tone of voice that Ross had. He
looked very confident and comfortable while speaking. At the same time, he
managed to be very funny (if not hilarious) and made the audience have a great
time. I absolutely agreed with the second place that was awarded to this
performance.
Catherine Butt
was next. This student is in my English set and therefore I already knew my
thoughts on her speech before she started talking. Anyway, I loved the way that
she described and referred to her mother. It was the perfect mixture between
tenderness and realism.
When Catherine
finished, Harry Oke-Osanyintolu started speaking. From my point of view, he was
the highlight of the night. Why? Because his speech had all the requirements
needed for winning success:
passion, well-memorised, an engaging subject and even
acting while delivering the speech. This performance definitely had all these
points. Honestly, I was surprised when I found out that he hadn’t won. (This is of course without
taking merit from the actual winner).
Joel Taylor kept
all the audience involved in the event thanks to his polemical speech based on
anti-feminism. As he said, it’s better to defend what we think and the truth, rather than being
politically correct. That is why I admired his performance, although he
shouldn’t have used any
notes, and nor did he need them.
Now it’s time to talk about the winner:
Anna Laurenceau. Some people, like me or even herself, were surprised at the
choice. However, later on I had the chance to think about it and I could
understand it. Talking about soccer with the passion that she did being a
female, is an unusual occurrence. Even though she forgot some tiny parts of
what she had to say during the performance, she was able to recover from these
mistakes and this culminated in a great speech.
Ted Johnson
decided to pick “ Space
and the human achievements made there” as his topic. I know (almost for sure) that if
he had memorised his speech properly, now we would be talking about one of the
most remarkable speeches of the event. Unluckily, this was not the case and,
although significant and interesting
research had been done his problems on stage delivering it from memory faltered
too often and this made the speech sound less prepared worse than it
actually was.
Then the next
participant started his speech off with one word. Cancer. This is how Greg
Kryukov kicked off his performance, and how he got all our attention; by saying
the name of what he was going to talk about. It sounded simple, but I thought
that it was a really smart move from him. In addition, he talked about all the
must-mention facts surrounding the disease.
To finish off the
event, Josephine Krieger spoke about the other side of JoelTaylor’s topic. Feminism. She defended her
reasons very well, and made us all understand some of the wider issues of
sexism nowadays.
In conclusion
Iona won the overall prize. Anna Laurenceau won as an individual with Ross Magill and Harry
Oke-Osanyintolu in joint second place. I and everyone agreed that all the
speakers made an incredible effort that resulted in, as Mr. McCarthy said, one
of the best House Speeches in a long time.